|
I soon found out that the Controlled
F.O.R.C.E. system made sense to me because
they understood the fact that all techniques
will fail at some time or another. The 5
M.A.C.H. holds were designed to teach
officers how to move, grab, let go, and grab
again which many officers in the middle of
an altercation have a problem doing. The
M.A.C.H. system is also used as a vehicle
for teaching officers how to move correctly.
They
explained that they wanted to tap into some
of my knowledge in the fighting world to
help officers learn how to move correctly
when under stress in encounters with street
savvy subjects as well as passive
resisters.
The
following are some of the misconceptions I
see taking place in the police and military
training world towards mixed martial arts
being taught in the police and
military world.
They
assume the following things when attacking
our way of thinking and teaching:
1) All
involved in the ultimate fighting game are
teaching police and military to perform
double leg takedowns and use submission
holds.
ANSWER: This could not be further from the
truth. After years of experience I have
learned officers must be taught the
fundamental basics of movement and control
to survive an encounter with a passive
resister and beyond. To teach officers
double leg takedowns and submission holds
does not apply to their line of work and is
offending my intelligence to say I would
even teach this to officers.
2) Ultimate
fighting techniques are not useful in the
police world because of use of force rules
now implemented in law enforcement
ANSWER: Quite the opposite is true. The
fundamentals of controlling a subject taught
in ultimate fighting are without a doubt the
best we have available to us in the history
of combat at whatever level. The ultimate
fight is simply a proving ground for these
techniques. By using this arena we quickly
find out what works and what does not work.
These techniques can be used to gain
compliance of a passive resister without
injury and can be escalated as needed if the
subject escalates in level of force.
3) The
skills needed in a cage fight cannot be used
to defend oneself against multiple
attackers.
ANSWER: Wrong!! The fundamentals of cage
fighting can easily be used to survive
multiple attackers. Don’t assume that I
would take a fight on the street to the
ground against even one opponent. And yes, I
have been attacked by multiple attackers and
things worked out quite nicely.
4) It
would be easy to stick the barrel of my gun
down the throat of a skilled fighter if he
were to attack you.
ANSWER: Who are you kidding? You think that
people announce when they are going to
attack a police officer. When officers are
attacked they are always surprised and very
seldom ready to react. Don’t mislead
officers by saying you would almost always
win the fight because you are in possession
of a firearm.
Imagine a highly trained fighter attacking
you when you’re not ready. He throws you on
your head and begins to pound you in the
face. You’re saying you would, while being
punched in the face, remove your hand from
protecting your head, reach down and pull
out your gun and shove it down the fighter’s
throat. Not likely.
If you
had been trained how to first stop the
takedown, then defend yourself on the ground
and escape back to your feet, you would then
be able to pull your weapon and take care of
business. I don't know about you but I would
rather understand how to survive the fight
first and depend on the weapon as a last
case scenario.
Officers who are trained in the ultimate
fighting techniques are much more confident
and less likely to panic under a stressful
situation. Using common sense on how to stay
relaxed in a verbal confrontation and the
skills of controlling subjects used in
ultimate fighting helps save lives. This is
our main goal right?
|